Jumat, 29 Maret 2013

Gadgetwise Blog: The Original Digital Pet Returns for a New Generation

Gadgetwise Blog: The Original Digital Pet Returns for a New Generation

Making the most of a recent nostalgia trend in technology that has brought back brands like Furby and Pac-Man, Bandai is reintroducing Tamagotchi, the digital pet from the 1990s, as a lifestyle brand called Tamagotchi L.I.F.E. (for Love Is Fun Everywhere).

The original Tamagotchi was a toy that fit on a keychain; the new version is a smartphone app. An iOS version was released on Thursday, following the introduction of an Android app last month. The app is free, but comes with banner ads; an ad-free version is available for 99 cents.

The app recreates the same nurturing play that Tamagotchi offered when it was introduced in the United States 16 years ago. It eats, it sleeps and it poops. It can die, too, so you have to take care of it by feeding it, playing games with it and giving it medicine when it gets sick. To increase awareness of your parenting duties, the little guy sends alerts when it needs attention, at least a half-dozen times a day. Fortunately, Tamagotchi sleeps through the night.

The app has color graphics and better resolution than the original Tamagotchi, but it still has the same pixelated appearance of the original. If you’re feeling really nostalgic, a toy mode replicates the look of the original, including the shell that housed it. The app also includes a few extras, like a rock-paper-scissors game and the ability to share photos of your bouncing baby blob on Facebook.

The app is a simple pastime, but I can see how it could get tedious after a few days for anyone over the age of 7. The Tamagotchi’s incessant appetite is bested only by the piles of stinking poop it makes (you can tell they are stinky because they have wavy stink lines rising above them).

Unlike other mindless apps, there are no ropes to cut or fruit to slice or birds to sling at pigs. Bandai may have updated the brand for a new audience, but it forgot to advance the concept.

Common Sense: Why Bad Directors Aren’t Thrown Out

Common Sense: Why Bad Directors Aren’t Thrown Out

In the annals of shareholder democracy, it’s hard to imagine a more compelling case against a company’s directors than those who presided over the serial management calamities that have plagued the computer giant Hewlett-Packard in recent years.

Imagine having to run on this track record:

¶ After ousting Mark Hurd as chief executive in 2010 amid messy allegations of sexual harassment, the board hired Léo Apotheker to replace him, even though Mr. Apotheker had been fired as chief executive of the European software giant SAP after just seven rocky months. Most of the board didn’t bother to meet Mr. Apotheker, let alone ask him any probing questions about his tenure at SAP, before rubber-stamping the choice of the board’s four-member search committee.

¶ In 2011, H.P.’s directors unanimously approved the acquisition of the British software maker Autonomy for $ 11.1 billion, a deal that was considered wildly overpriced even at the time. Less than a year later, H.P. wrote off $ 8.8 billion of that and claimed it had been defrauded. (Autonomy officials have denied the allegations, which are being investigated by authorities in both the United States and Britain.) Some consider Autonomy to be the worst corporate acquisition in business history. In fiscal year 2012, H.P. wrote off a total of $ 18 billion related to failed acquisitions and other missteps.

¶ With Mr. Apotheker at the helm and the board backing his strategic initiatives, H.P. announced that it was considering abandoning its giant personal computer business, then changed its mind. After Mr. Apotheker had been on the job a disastrous 11 months, the board demanded his resignation, and then paid him more than $ 13 million in termination benefits.

Shareholders might have forgiven what Fortune magazine called a “tawdry reality show” if the stock had performed well. But from the time Mr. Apotheker was hired in September 2010 until he left in 2011, the stock went from more than $ 45 a share to a little more than $ 22. Despite a recent rally, shares are still below $ 24, even as the Dow Jones and Standard & Poor’s 500-stock indexes are hitting new highs.

“You really couldn’t have a stronger case for removing directors,” Michael Garland, executive director for corporate governance in the New York City comptroller’s office, told me this week. “There’s been a long series of boardroom failures that have harmed the reputation of the company and repeatedly destroyed shareholder value over an extended period of time.”

Yet all 11 H.P. directors were re-elected on March 20.

H.P. is hardly an isolated case. According to Patrick McGurn, special counsel for one of the major shareholder advisory services, Institutional Shareholder Services, shareholder efforts to remove directors in uncontested elections rarely succeed or come close, even in egregious circumstances. Last year, there were elections for 17,081 director nominees at United States corporations, according to the service. Only 61 of those nominees, or 0.36 percent, failed to get majority support. More than 86 percent of directors received 90 percent or more of the votes. Of the 61 directors who failed to get majority approval, only six actually stepped down or were asked to resign. Fifty-one are still in place, as of the most recent proxy filings.

“People are calling them zombie directors,” Mr. McGurn said. But that hasn’t stopped them from serving on boards for what is typically lucrative compensation for relatively little work. (H.P.’s directors received a mix of cash and stock payments ranging from $ 292,000 to $ 380,000 in 2012.

While the H.P. board has been largely reconstituted since the debacle of Mr. Apotheker’s appointment, all but one (Ralph Whitworth, a well-known value investor who joined in November 2011) approved the disastrous Autonomy deal. Raymond Lane, seen as an ally and supporter, at least initially, of Mr. Apotheker, was named chairman at the same time Mr. Apotheker took the helm. Working closely with Mr. Apotheker, Mr. Lane proposed five new directors. John Hammergren, chief executive of the McKesson Corporation, has been on the board for eight years, and G. Kennedy Thompson, chief executive of Wachovia before it was forced into a merger with Wells Fargo during the financial crisis, has been a board member for seven years. Mr. Hammergren was on the search committee that recommended Mr. Apotheker’s appointment.

In its proxy materials, H.P. didn’t address the company’s record under these directors, but nonetheless recommended that shareholders vote for the entire slate, citing the risk of “destabilizing” the company by changing directors in an “abrupt and disorderly manner.” As to Mr. Lane, Mr. Hammergren and Mr. Thompson, it repeatedly cited their “experience” in running global companies, but said nothing about their roles in selecting Mr. Apotheker or other directors, the Autonomy acquisition, other failed strategic initiatives or, indeed, anything at all about their tenures at H.P.

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: March 29, 2013

An earlier version of this article used outdated figures for the board’s compensation in 2012. The directors received a mix of cash and stock payments ranging from $ 292,000 to $ 380,000 in 2012, not $ 290,000 to $ 355,000, which was the payment range for 2011. The earlier version also misstated the compensation of Mr. Lane, the board chairman, for 2012. He received neither a cash award nor equities in 2012, though he received two large equity awards in 2011.
 

Gadgetwise Blog: App Smart Extra: For the Garden

Gadgetwise Blog: App Smart Extra: For the Garden

This week, App Smart was all about gardening because spring has sprung, or is about to. There are many apps that can help you in the garden, like plant reference guides or advice about garden bugs, and even apps that can help you manage your garden and its plants over time.

A useful reference is the free Android app Garden Plants Growing Guide. Unlike some of its peers, this app is a little pedestrian in design because of its plain lists of plants and simple pages full of text. But it contains an impressive database of flowers, vegetables and herbs â€" with more of an emphasis on flowers â€" and each entry has a photo and detailed advice on when to sow a plant and how to take care of it. You’ll have to know the Latin name for many of the flowers, though, because that is how the app lists them and there are no thumbnail photos in the flowers list to help identify them.

Fruit Garden is a slightly similar $ 0.99 Android and $ 1.99 iOS app with a focus on fruit plants. It’s a list of common varieties, with details on each to help you understand how to best plant and grow them. The app lacks useful extras like garden management facilities, and its list of plants is not exhaustive. But it has taught me how to better feed the orange trees in my garden.

The Gardening Guide is a much more detailed app that has lots of advice about planting and tending your garden. It’s aimed more at vegetable gardening than flower gardening, but each entry is well written and has comprehensive advice on each crop. For example, I learned that it’s a good idea to harvest lettuce in the morning, after the leaves have plumped with water overnight. It’s listed as The Gardening Guide From Mother Earth News on iTunes, and as Garden Guide in Google’s app store.

If you’re planning a bit of a spring garden redesign, the aptly named Garden Design Ideas, free on Android, may help. It’s a large list of photos of gardens, with no extra details or data on plants and so on because it’s all about a garden’s visuals. It shows all sorts of gardens, like modern ones or Japanese-style ones. This app is fairly simple, but it may frustrate you if you fixate on a particular design and want to know more about it.

Quick call

Pandora, one of the hottest music streaming apps out there, is finally available as a free Windows Phone 8 app â€" and as a sweetener, the app has no ads and no monthly streaming limit through the rest of this year.

Kamis, 28 Maret 2013

Online Dispute Becomes Internet-Snarling Attack

Online Dispute Becomes Internet-Snarling Attack

A squabble between a group fighting spam and a Dutch company that hosts Web sites said to be sending spam has escalated into one of the largest computer attacks on the Internet, causing widespread congestion and jamming crucial infrastructure around the world.

Millions of ordinary Internet users have experienced delays in services like Netflix or could not reach a particular Web site for a short time.

However, for the Internet engineers who run the global network the problem is more worrisome. The attacks are becoming increasingly powerful, and computer security experts worry that if they continue to escalate people may not be able to reach basic Internet services, like e-mail and online banking.

The dispute started when the spam-fighting group, called Spamhaus, added the Dutch company Cyberbunker to its blacklist, which is used by e-mail providers to weed out spam. Cyberbunker, named for its headquarters, a five-story former NATO bunker, offers hosting services to any Web site “except child porn and anything related to terrorism,” according to its Web site.

A spokesman for Spamhaus, which is based in Europe, said the attacks began on March 19, but had not stopped the group from distributing its blacklist.

Patrick Gilmore, chief architect at Akamai Technologies, a digital content provider, said Spamhaus’s role was to generate a list of Internet spammers.

Of Cyberbunker, he added: “These guys are just mad. To be frank, they got caught. They think they should be allowed to spam.”

Mr. Gilmore said that the attacks, which are generated by swarms of computers called botnets, concentrate data streams that are larger than the Internet connections of entire countries. He likened the technique, which uses a long-known flaw in the Internet’s basic plumbing, to using a machine gun to spray an entire crowd when the intent is to kill one person.

The attacks were first mentioned publicly last week by CloudFlare, an Internet security firm in Silicon Valley that was trying to defend against the attacks and as a result became a target.

“These things are essentially like nuclear bombs,” said Matthew Prince, chief executive of CloudFlare. “It’s so easy to cause so much damage.”

The so-called distributed denial of service, or DDoS, attacks have reached previously unknown magnitudes, growing to a data stream of 300 billion bits per second.

“It is a real number,” Mr. Gilmore said. “It is the largest publicly announced DDoS attack in the history of the Internet.”

Spamhaus, one of the most prominent groups tracking spammers on the Internet, uses volunteers to identify spammers and has been described as an online vigilante group.

In the past, blacklisted sites have retaliated against Spamhaus with denial-of-service attacks, in which they flood Spamhaus with traffic requests from personal computers until its servers become unreachable. But in recent weeks, the attackers hit back with a far more powerful strike that exploited the Internet’s core infrastructure, called the Domain Name System, or DNS.

That system functions like a telephone switchboard for the Internet. It translates the names of Web sites like Facebook.com or Google.com into a string of numbers that the Internet’s underlying technology can understand. Millions of computer servers around the world perform the actual translation.

In the latest incident, attackers sent messages, masquerading as ones coming from Spamhaus, to those machines, which were then amplified drastically by the servers, causing torrents of data to be aimed back at the Spamhaus computers.

When Spamhaus requested aid from CloudFlare, the attackers began to focus their digital ire on the companies that provide data connections for both Spamhaus and CloudFlare.

Questioned about the attacks, Sven Olaf Kamphuis, an Internet activist who said he was a spokesman for the attackers, said in an online message that, “We are aware that this is one of the largest DDoS attacks the world had publicly seen.” Mr. Kamphuis said Cyberbunker was retaliating against Spamhaus for “abusing their influence.”

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: March 29, 2013

An article on Wednesday about an Internet snarl caused by a dispute between a spam-fighting organization and a company that hosts Web sites misstated part of the name of the employer of Patrick Gilmore, who commented on the parties involved in the squabble. He is chief architect for Akamai Technologies, not Akamai Networks.

Bits Blog: A Marshall McLuhan Approach to Weather Forecasting

Bits Blog: A Marshall McLuhan Approach to Weather Forecasting

If Marshall McLuhan had been a rocket scientist, he might have liked PlanetIQ’s approach to forecasting the weather. It uses signals from GPS satellites, but not for positioning. Instead, it measures distortion in these signals to learn about the atmosphere through which they passed. To quote McLuhan out of context, the medium is the message in this case: the manner of acquiring the information is more important than the information itself.

PlanetIQ sees an opening for itself because the United States network of weather satellites is aging and the replacement satellites are delayed and over budget. So PlanetIQ, a start-up based in Bethesda, Md., is using a physics trick to get information from existing satellites and plug it into computerized weather models.

The company wants to put 12 tiny satellites into orbit that will do nothing except watch the GPS satellites rise and set on Earth’s horizon. The signals sent from these satellites are bent by the atmosphere at an angle that indicates the air’s temperature, pressure and water vapor content. PlanetIQ’s satellites can determine the angle because the way the signals are bent delays their arrival. The GPS signal already encodes the time at which it was sent; the time it should have arrived had there been no bend can be computed if one knows the distance the signal was supposed to have traveled.

“GPS is a giant timing system,’’ said Anne Hale Miglarese, PlanetIQ’s president and chief executive.

The idea, called radio occultation, has great promise, according to experts. “There’s definitely a lot of interest,’’ said Crystal B. Schaaf, a professor of remote sensing at the University of Massachusetts, Boston. “Anything that gives us any information about the atmospheric profile is a godsend when you’re trying to trigger numerical prediction models.’’

“As meteorologists, we’ve relied for many years off launching weather balloons and getting these far-separated points,’’ Professor Schaaf said, adding that satellite observation would provide much more data.

In PlanetIQ’s system, each satellite would take 1,000 readings a day from the GPS satellites, with each reading measuring the temperature and pressure of the slice of Earth’s atmosphere through which the signal traveled. The fleet would generate about 5.5 million readings a day, which would be integrated by a computer on the ground into a 3-D map of atmospheric data.

PlanetIQ would also measure the earth’s magnetosphere, which indicates when a solar storm is in progress. Such storms can threaten power grids and other terrestrial activity.

The atmospheric measurements would not allow for much weather forecasting on their own, but they could supplement data from other sources to make forecasts more precise, Ms. Miglarese said.

Peter J. Minnett, chairman of the meteorology and physical oceanography department at the University of Miami, said that GPS receivers of the kind PlanetIQ proposes would probably be included in future weather satellites, but that it would take time to put a significant number in use. And the ability to launch new satellites as fast as the old ones decay is no longer assured, he said, because governments have limited resources.

Professor Minnett added that the idea of a commercial company collecting data and selling it to the government would be a shift from the current approach, in which agencies like NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration gather the data and exchange it freely.

Commercialization is always tricky. PlanetIQ says it needs $ 160 million to get its satellites in orbit. To raise that money, it probably needs contracts with national weather services.

It is seeking to sign up NOAA, the parent agency of the National Weather Service, as an “anchor tenant” for its system. But so far, NOAA has been noncommittal.

A spokesman said, “We welcome any reliable data that helps the National Weather Service meet its mission requirements while also being cost-effective and properly reflected in our budget.”

Attacks on Spamhaus Used Internet Against Itself

Attacks on Spamhaus Used Internet Against Itself

An escalating cyberattack involving an antispam group and a shadowy group of attackers has now affected millions of people across the Internet, raising the question: How can such attacks be stopped?

The short answer is: Not easily. The digital “fire hose” being wielded by the attackers to jam traffic on the Internet in recent weeks was made possible by both the best and worst aspects of the sprawling global computer network. The Internet is, by default, an open, loosely regulated platform for communication, but many of the servers that make its communication possible have been configured in such a way that they can be easily fooled.

The latest attacks, which appeared to have subsided by Wednesday, have demonstrated just how big a problem that can be.

On Tuesday, security engineers said that an anonymous group unhappy with Spamhaus, a volunteer organization that distributes a blacklist of spammers to e-mail providers, had retaliated with a cyberattack of vast proportions.

In what is called a distributed denial of service, or DDoS, attack, the assailants harnessed a powerful botnet â€" a network of thousands of infected computers being controlled remotely â€" to send attack traffic first to Spamhaus’s Web site and later to the Internet servers used by CloudFlare, a Silicon Valley company that Spamhaus hired to deflect its onslaught.

This kind of attack works because the botnet exploits Internet routing software and fools Internet servers into responding to requests for information sent simultaneously by a large group of computers. The Internet servers that answer the requests are tricked into sending blocks of data to the victims, in this case Spamhaus and CloudFlare.

The attack was amplified because each of the servers in this case was asked to send a relatively large block of information. The data stream grew from 10 billion bits per second last week to as much as 300 billion bits per second this week, the largest such attack ever reported, causing what CloudFlare estimated to be hundreds of millions of people to experience delays and error messages across the Web.

On Wednesday, CloudFlare described the highly technical game of cat-and-mouse between itself and Spamhaus’s opponents that has played out over the course of the last nine days. After the attackers discovered that they could not disable CloudFlare, which had been hired by Spamhaus to absorb its attack traffic, they changed their strategy.

They took aim at the networks that CloudFlare connected to and began to attack the computer servers that serve as the network’s foundation. These are specialized “peering” points at which Internet networks exchange traffic. The attackers took aim at organizations like the London, Amsterdam, Frankfurt and Hong Kong Internet exchanges, which route regional Internet traffic and are also used by sites like Google, Facebook and Yahoo to pass traffic efficiently among one another.

Here, too, they were unable to stall the Internet completely, but they did slow it, particularly by focusing on the London exchange, known as LINX.

“From our perspective, the attacks had the largest effect on LINX,” said Matthew Prince, CloudFlare’s chief executive, in a description posted on the company’s Web site on Wednesday. For a little over an hour on Saturday, he said, the traffic passing through the LINX infrastructure dropped significantly.

The attacks were episodic, stopping and starting and shifting targets over nine days through Tuesday morning. On Wednesday, Mr. Prince said that there some indications that the attackers were planning further actions, although he said he did not know if they would include DDoS attacks.

Veteran Internet engineers said the attack was made possible by a combination of defects, loopholes and sloppy configuration of Internet routing equipment. Indeed, a number of computer security specialists pointed out that the attacks would have been impossible if the world’s major Internet firms simply checked that outgoing data packets truly were being sent by their customers, rather than botnets. Unfortunately, a relatively small number of Internet companies actually perform this kind of check.

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: March 28, 2013

An earlier version of this article rendered incorrectly, in one reference, part of the name of the organization that oversees the Internet domain name system. As noted in another reference, it is the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, not the International Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers.

Gadgetwise Blog: Tip of the Week: Beware of Tax Season Scams

Gadgetwise Blog: Tip of the Week: Beware of Tax Season Scams

The deadline for filing federal (and many state) tax returns is just a few weeks away, so the level of scam e-mail messages claiming to be from the Internal Revenue Service are likely to increase in the coming days. Remember, the I.R.S. does not initially contact taxpayers by e-mail or text message to request PIN codes, Social Security numbers or other financial data. Do not click on any Web links or open attachments included with these types of messages because you could inadvertently install malicious software on the computer. You can report suspicious mail by forwarding the messages to phishing@irs.gov and the agency’s site has a page with additional safety information.

Media Decoder Blog: A Driving Force Behind Wikipedia Will Step Down

Media Decoder Blog: A Driving Force Behind Wikipedia Will Step Down

Sue Gardner, who oversaw a period of rapid growth and evolution of Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, said she would step down as executive director of the nonprofit foundation that runs it.

In an interview on Wednesday, Ms. Gardner, 45, said she would leave in roughly six months, after the Wikimedia Foundation board had picked a successor.

She said she wanted to advocate more directly on behalf of an open Internet, by starting a nonprofit group, writing a book or joining an advocacy organization.

“Wikipedia will be fine,” she said. “It’s a behemoth, and people love it.”

But, she added, “I worry about the broader conditions of a free and open Internet and the future of other Wikipedia-like projects.”

Ms. Gardner took over the nonprofit foundation that oversees Wikipedia in 2007, a time of intense skepticism about the accuracy of the free online encyclopedia that relies entirely on tens of thousands of volunteers to write and edit entries that now appear in 285 languages.

Ms. Gardner worked to establish relationships with librarians, scholars and grant-making institutions. “At that time people didn’t know what to make of it,” she said of Wikipedia. Today, she added, “Wikipedia is widely acknowledged as useful in a way it wasn’t five or six years ago.”

With credibility came scale. Today, Wikipedia has more than 488 million unique visitors each month, making it the fifth most-visited Web site in the world behind Google, Yahoo, Microsoft and Facebook and ahead of Amazon, Apple and eBay, according to comScore data from January.

In the fiscal year that ended June 30, 2008, the Wikimedia Foundation had total assets of $ 5.6 million, compared with $ 49.3 million in total assets in the period from July 1 to Dec. 31, 2012, according to its financial statements.

In 2007 the Wikimedia Foundation, then based in a shopping center in St. Petersburg, Fla., had fewer than 10 employees and raised less than $ 3 million annually.

Ms. Gardner moved the foundation to San Francisco. It now has roughly 160 paid employees. Its most recent fund-raising drive late last year yielded $ 25 million to help run Wikipedia from 1.2 million donors.

Ms. Gardner said the “turning point” for her decision to leave Wikimedia came early last year when she oversaw a blackout of Wikipedia to protest two antipiracy bills under consideration in Washington â€" the Stop Online Piracy Act and the Protect Intellectual Property Act.

The protests “started me thinking about the shape the Internet was taking and what role I could play in that,” she said.

She also said it was important to leave before Wikimedia suffered from a “founder’s trap,” when a group is too dependent on one personality. When she took over, Wikipedia was still tethered to its co-founder, Jimmy Wales, who started it in 2001. “It’s important not to let any organization be overly defined by any single person,” she said. “That’s particularly the case in the Wikipedia movement because it’s a collaborative movement.”

Mr. Wales, a member of the Wikimedia board, said in an e-mail that Ms. Gardner had taken over “at a pivotal time in our movement’s history” and “helped our community build a long and healthy future for Wikipedia.”

Rabu, 27 Maret 2013

State of the Art: Google Keep, a Note Pad, Lets You Hold All Thoughts

State of the Art: Google Keep, a Note Pad, Lets You Hold All Thoughts

In the early days of personal computers, people talked about how great they’d be for managing recipes. Remember?

And then remember how that notion, very soon after, was mocked? How absurd. How sexist. And on the scale of amazing things a PC could do, how pedestrian and unambitious.

Well, don’t look now. But Google, the company that tamed the Web, built self-driving cars and put a computer on eyeglasses, has just introduced a note pad.

It’s called Google Keep. It’s free. It’s a Web site and an app for Android phones; the two are automatically synchronized. (Astoundingly, until now, Google didn’t supply a note pad app on Android phones.)

Make a note on the phone, it shows up on the site (and any other Android gadgets you own), assuming you’re signed in with the same Google ID on each one.

This isn’t a fresh idea. In many ways, Google Keep is a fairly shameless imitation of Evernote, the beloved free app for Mac, Windows, Android, iPhone/iPad, BlackBerry and Windows Phone. It, too, keeps your notes automatically duplicated across all your gadgets and computers.

That’s not to take away from the power of the idea. Life is full of facts, thoughts and images we’d like to remember. Someone’s phone number. A movie or book someone’s recommending. Things to do. Brainstorms. Where you parked. Family birthdays, driving directions to the doctor, frequent-flier numbers. You always have a computer with you (your phone); why isn’t it the logical place to store these brain bursts?

Especially if it’s incredibly easy and fast to do. If there were much “friction” involved in opening your notepad and recording some notion, you wouldn’t bother. But Google has put a lot of effort into making things effortless. Keep is not just an app; on Android, it’s also a widget â€" a small scrolling window floating right there on the Home screen. (Evernote does that, too.)

On recent versions of Android (4.2 and later), Keep even appears on the Lock screen. You can consult it without even turning on the phone.

To record a new item, you can type something; speak and record the audio; say something the phone converts into typing (it saves the audio recording, too); or take a picture. Speech and photos are faster than typing; once again, fewer steps means you’re more likely to use the thing. (You have to take the photo; you can’t import one that already exists.)

A text note can be either straight-ahead unformatted text or a checklist complete with little checkboxes or a photo.

In Keep, the notes appear as scrolling tiles, like posts on a Facebook page or, in two-column view, like the tiles on the Windows Phone Start screen. Newest ones appear at the top.

The most important thing to grasp about Keep is how simple it is. Fast and simple and limited, especially compared with Evernote.

That, of course, is its best and worst feature, depending on what kind of personality you have. You won’t have trouble fumbling to find a feature; there aren’t any to find.

You can change a note’s color, but you can’t group them by color. In fact, you can’t group them in any way. There isn’t any notion of folders, or sorting, or filtering. The only thing you can do with a note is drag it up or down, delete it or, by swiping horizontally on the phone’s screen, archive it (that is, remove it from the list but keep it in storage).

In Evernote, by contrast, you can create separate “notebooks” full of notes; you can even put several notebooks into a folder.

An Evernote item can contain more than one data type â€" a text note might contain a checklist and a photo, for example. Notes can have formatting (bold, italic and so on), and can have Web addresses or geographical locations associated with them. You can tag a note with searchable keywords (“kids,” “sites,” “work,” whatever) for quick retrieval later; in Google Keep, all you can do is search for the text in your notes.

E-mail: pogue@nytimes.com

Gadgetwise Blog: A Slimmer Keyboard for the iPad

Gadgetwise Blog: A Slimmer Keyboard for the iPad

It’s easier to type on a tablet with a keyboard, but it’s so much easier to carry a tablet without a keyboard.

The accessory manufacturer Belkin has sought a compromise with its new Ultimate Keyboard Case, which it calls the thinnest iPad keyboard available.

The keyboard, at about a quarter-inch thickness, is about half as thick as the iPad itself when snapped into the case’s plastic shell, which holds it to the cover. The keys have a definitive motion, so you can tell when you’ve hit them, although the keyboard, which is backed with iPad-style matte aluminum, is a bit cramped.

The iPad can be set at three angles, using magnets on top of the keyboard to hold it in place. The magnets could stand to be a little stronger, because the iPad occasionally flopped loose when I used my knees as the typing surface. That is partly because the hinge is made of a kind of flexible faux hide.

The magnet that holds the case closed, however, seemed to do the job.

The case also can be folded so that its pad alone can be used when you only want to use the touch screen.

The top row of buttons has shortcut keys, like video controls; access is made by hitting the Fn key on the lower left. A key in the upper left marked only with a square can summon Siri. The keyboard’s Bluetooth paired easily with the tablet, although it occasionally seemed to lose the connection.

The company said the battery would last 160 hours under constant use, and six months in standby mode.

The $ 100 keyboard case becomes available online through Belkin in April.

Bits Blog: Instagram and the New Era of Paparazzi

Bits Blog: Instagram and the New Era of Paparazzi

Earlier this week, a rare and new photo of the pop star Beyoncé and her daughter, Blue Ivy, quickly spread around the Internet, on various celebrity and gossip sites.

There was nothing particularly unusual about the photo itself: It was a simple shot of the singer, smiling, carrying her sleepy daughter as they exited a restaurant in Brooklyn.

But the paparazzi-style photo did not come from a typical photographer: It came from Instagram.

Raquel Sabz, who goes by the online name “Rich Girl on a Budget,” appears to have posted the photograph on Instagram and Twitter late Sunday night. (The photo has since been deleted from Instagram, although her Twitter post remains online.) Not long after, Splash News purchased the photo for an undisclosed amount and distributed it to a number of sites, including People.com, NYDailyNews.com and The Huffington Post.

Ms. Sabz declined requests for an interview and referred to Splash News for more information about the sale and transactions. Inquiries to Splash News did not result in an interview.

Molly Goodson, a senior editor and the vice president for content at PopSugar, a celebrity news site, was among those who purchased the photograph of Beyoncé with her child.

The average person has eyes in places where regular paparazzi don’t have them, she said. “The whole world becomes a photo agency at that point. More so than ever before.”

Ms. Goodson said that during her six-year tenure at PopSugar, she has seen the rapid rise of Instagram as a popular source for images of famous people in the wild. This is partly because of the spread of smartphones with more-than-decent cameras, and the ability to publish instantly anywhere, anytime, within seconds and reach millions by posting photos publicly across the network of social media sites.

It is also partly because of celebrities who have taken their public images into their own hands and publish photos on Instagram and Twitter, as well as support staffers, like hairstylists and makeup artists, who do the same. Ms. Goodson gave the Oscars as an example, with the first images of celebrities attending the affair trickling out through the Web, rather than through traditional sources.

“That was the first place you would see any dresses or what Jennifer Lawrence is wearing,” she said. “It’s not the photo agency or TV.”

It’s a striking shift from the way those photos were distributed historically.

“The old school way was that you would get an e-mail that said, ‘I was on vacation and saw so-and-so and I’d like to sell it to you,’” she said. “Fans are far less likely to do that now. They’d rather share it themselves first on Twitter and Instagram than sell it immediately. People are dedicated to gaining their own followings and that’s the best way to do that.”

Before, she said, the asking price for photos could stretch into the hundreds of thousands, depending on the rarity of the sighting. But now, because most people see them first on sites like Tumblr, Instagram, Twitter and Facebook, it’s harder to command a hefty price tag. Photos can go for a fraction of their historically high cost, she said.

“It’s certainly devalued by the fact that it’s already out there,” she said.

Selasa, 26 Maret 2013

T-Mobile Unveils Aggressive Phone Pricing With No Contracts

T-Mobile Unveils Aggressive Phone Pricing With No Contracts

T-Mobile USA, the struggling wireless carrier, has a ray of hope: It’s finally getting the iPhone, it’s selling the device at an aggressive price, and customers won’t have to sign a contract.

The company on Tuesday said the Apple iPhone 5 would be available starting April 12 for $ 100 up front, with customers paying an additional $ 20 a month for 24 months for the handset. Other new smartphones, like the Samsung Galaxy S IV and the BlackBerry Z10, will be available with similar payment plans.

Although there would be no contract binding customers to T-Mobile, the No. 4 American mobile carrier by market share, customers would have to pay off the balance they owe on their phone to end service before the two years are up.

Also Tuesday, T-Mobile formally replaced its old phone contracts with new plans that do not require signing a contract. For $ 50 a month, customers can get unlimited minutes, text messages and 500 megabytes of data; they can pay an extra $ 20 for unlimited data.

Over two years, the effective price for a smartphone and phone service would be hundreds of dollars less than it would on AT&T or Verizon Wireless. At $ 580, it would also be cheaper than buying a $ 649 unlocked phone directly from Apple.

At those two carriers, the most popular phone plans cost upwards of $ 100 a month with a two-year contract for limited data. The iPhone 5 costs at least $ 199 on their networks with a two-year contract.

The simplified phone plans are part of T-Mobile’s new campaign to be the “un-carrier.” By moving to contract-free plans, it says it is doing away with charging customers fees for surpassing their data limits or terminating their service early.

John Legere, T-Mobile USA’s new chief executive, said that over two years, an iPhone on T-Mobile will cost $ 1,000 less than it would on AT&T. He said moving toward contract-free plans would make the price that people pay more transparent and save them money over time.

“Do you have any idea what you’re paying?” Mr. Legere said at a press event in New York. “I’m going to explain how stupid we all are because once it becomes flat and transparent, there’s nowhere to hide. You pay so much for your phones, it’s incredible.”

Gadgetwise Blog: Q&A: Erasing Saved Web Site Passwords

Gadgetwise Blog: Q&A: Erasing Saved Web Site Passwords

I’ve been clicking the button to have my Web browser save user names and passwords for sites I visit frequently, but now I’m thinking this may not be safe if my laptop is stolen. How can I make the browser forget them all?

In Mozilla Firefox for Windows and Mac OS X, go to the Tools menu in the menu bar and select Options. In the Options box, click the Security tab and click on “Saved Passwords.” Click on “Remove All” to dump all the saved passwords, or click “View Saved Passwords” to selectively eliminate information.

In Google Chrome for Windows, click the wrench icon, select Options and click the Personal Stuff tab. Click the “Show Saved Passwords” button and select the entries you want to eliminate. On the Mac version of Chrome, go to the Chrome menu, select Preferences and then Settings. Click the “Show Advanced Settings” link, and under “Passwords and forms,” click “Manage Saved Passwords” to edit the information.

To clear all saved passwords in Microsoft Internet Explorer 9 and later, go to the Tools menu, select Safety and choose “Delete Browsing History.” In the box that appears, turn on the checkboxes next to “Form Data” and “Passwords” and click the Delete button; turning off the checkbox next to “Preserve Favorites website data” clears cookies and other temporary files that sites have stored on your computer as well. (You can delete individual saved passwords by selecting the username and password that appear in the login field when you visit a saved site, and then pressing the Delete key.)

In the latest version of Apple’s Safari browser, go to the Safari menu and select Preferences. In the Preferences box, click the Passwords tab and choose which ones to remove from the browser’s memory. You can also remove passwords and other information from Web sites by going to the Safari menu, choosing Reset Safari, and selecting the data you want to delete.

Bits Blog: Beware of the High Cost of ‘Free’ Online Courses

Bits Blog: Beware of the High Cost of ‘Free’ Online Courses

That the acronym MOOCs rhymes with “nukes” seems apt. Massive open online courses, or MOOCs â€" led by two profit-making start-ups, Coursera and Udacity, founded by entrepreneurial Stanford professors â€" are a new disruptive force in education. Leading universities have scrambled to join or offer alternatives like edX, a collaboration of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard University and others.

The MOOCs movement has been greeted with equal parts enthusiasm and angst. The MOOC champions predict a technology-fueled revolution in the distribution and democratization of high-quality education. The MOOC skeptics have a variety of qualms, but especially about what is lost in the retreat of face-to-face teaching â€" a point eloquently made by Andrew Delbanco, a professor of American studies at Columbia University, in an article in the current New Republic, “MOOCs of Hazard.”

Michael A. Cusumano, a professor at the Sloan School of Management at M.I.T., raises a different issue in an essay published this week: the economics of MOOCs and the implications.

His article appears in Communications of the ACM, the monthly magazine of the Association for Computing Machinery, and he had circulated a version of it earlier to his M.I.T. colleagues. After reading it, L. Rafael Rief, M.I.T.’s president, asked Mr. Cusumano to serve on a task force on the “residential university” of the future, including online initiatives.

“My fear is that we’re plunging forward with these massively free online education resources and we’re not thinking much about the economics,” Mr. Cusumano said in an interview.

The MOOC champions, Mr. Cusumano said, are well-intentioned people who “think it’s a social good to distribute education for free.”

But Mr. Cusumano questions that assumption. “Free is actually very elitist,” he said. The long-term future of university education along the MOOC path, he said, could be a “few large, well-off survivors” and a wasteland of casualties.

Mr. Cusumano’s concerns grow out of his study of the software and media industries in the face of price pressure from free, open-source software and digital distribution over the Internet. Two-thirds of the public companies in the software industry disappeared between 1998 and 2006, as companies failed or were acquired. In the media world, Mr. Cusumano contends that newspaper and magazine companies â€" including The New York Times Company â€" made a strategic mistake by giving away their publications free on the Web. The online pay walls that publications have since put up, he said, seem to be helping to stabilize things, but only after a precipitous decline.

Give-away pricing in education, Mr. Cusumano warns, may well be a comparable misstep. The damage would occur, he writes in the article, “if increasing numbers of universities and colleges joined the free online education movement and set a new threshold price for the industry â€" zero â€" which becomes commonly accepted and difficult to undo.”

In our conversation, I offered the obvious counterargument. Why should education necessarily be immune from this digital, Darwinian wave, when other industries are not? Isn’t this just further evidence of the march of disruptive progress that ultimately benefits society?

Mr. Cusumano has heard this reasoning before, and he is unconvinced. In the article, he explains, “I am mostly concerned about second- and third-tier universities and colleges, and community colleges, many of which play critical roles for education and economic development in their local regions and communities.”

“In education,” Mr. Cusumano adds, “‘free’ in the long run may actually reduce variety and opportunities for learning as well as lessen our stocks of knowledge.”

Later he writes: “Will two-thirds of the education industry disappear? Maybe not, but maybe! It is hard to believe that we will be better off as a society with only a few remaining megawealthy universities.”

Senin, 25 Maret 2013

Disruptions: F.A.A. May Loosen Curbs on Fliers’ Use of Electronics

Disruptions: F.A.A. May Loosen Curbs on Fliers’ Use of Electronics

If you’re sitting on a plane at the gate and reading this column on an electronic gadget, you’re about to hear eight dreaded words: “Please power down your electronic devices for takeoff.” But this time next year, you might hear something very different: “Please put your devices on ‘airplane mode’ for takeoff.”

According to people who work with an industry working group that the Federal Aviation Administration set up last year to study the use of portable electronics on planes, the agency hopes to announce by the end of this year that it will relax the rules for reading devices during takeoff and landing. The change would not include cellphones.

One member of the group and an official of the F.A.A., both of whom asked for anonymity because they were not allowed to speak publicly about internal discussions, said the agency was under tremendous pressure to let people use reading devices on planes, or to provide solid scientific evidence why they cannot.

As I wrote in 2011, travelers are told to turn off their iPads and Kindles for takeoff and landing, yet there is no proof that these devices affect a plane’s avionics. To add to the confusion, the F.A.A. permits passengers to use electric razors and audio recorders during all phases of flight, even though those give off more electronic emissions than reading tablets.

The F.A.A. declined to comment.

Last year, the agency announced that an industry working group would study the issue. The group, which first met in January, comprises people from various industries, including Amazon, the Consumer Electronics Association, Boeing, the Association of Flight Attendants, the Federal Communications Commission and aircraft makers. The group plans to introduce its findings by July 31.

The group has several goals beyond determining the safety of electronics on planes, according to an internal document that describes its objectives that was shown to The New York Times. Those include ensuring that flight attendants do not have to be the social police for which devices are acceptable during flight and determining what the term “airplane mode” really means. Finally, the group wants to ensure that whatever rules the agency announces apply to devices that are not on the market today.

The report also hopes to replace multiple regulations with a single, concise set.

To guarantee that the F.A.A. follows through with its promise to relax the rules, Senator Claire McCaskill, Democrat of Missouri, said she planned to hold the agency accountable by introducing legislation.

In a phone interview, Ms. McCaskill said she had grown frustrated with the F.A.A.’s stance on devices after she learned that the agency now allows iPads as flight manuals in the cockpit and has subsequently given out devices to some flight attendants with information on flight procedures.

“So it’s O.K. to have iPads in the cockpit; it’s O.K. for flight attendants â€" and they are not in a panic â€" yet it’s not O.K. for the traveling public,” she said. “A flying copy of ‘War and Peace’ is more dangerous than a Kindle.”

In recent months, Julius Genachowski, chairman of the F.C.C., sent a letter to the F.A.A. urging it to allow more electronics on planes. Airline pilots unions, travel coalitions and travel agencies have also asked the agency to change the rules. There have also been more episodes of unruly passengers who have been arrested or removed from planes for refusing to turn off their cellphones or iPads.

Ms. McCaskill met this month with Mr. Genachowski, who said on Friday that he will leave the commission soon, to discuss the rule. After the meeting, she said, “The idea that in-flight use of electronic devices for things like reading a book poses a threat to the safety of airline passengers is baseless and outdated.”

The issue is only increasing in importance as more Americans board flights with wearable computers. People are flying with electronics like the Nike FuelBand, Jawbone Up and FitBit, all of which track your daily activity. But before long, there will be passengers with Google glasses and an Apple iWatch.

Can you imagine pilots mandating that people shut down their glasses before takeoff?

“We’re going to start drafting legislation that would dictate these changes,” said Ms. McCaskill, adding that the F.A.A. was moving too slowly. She said she was meeting with various parties and corralling bipartisan support for action in Congress. “Let’s hope it’s not necessary, but I will be looking for vehicles to get this changed.”

DealBook: Dell Founder Said to Weigh Switching to Blackstone Offer

DealBook: Dell Founder Said to Weigh Switching to Blackstone Offer

3:20 p.m. | Updated

With the emergence of the Blackstone Group as a suitor for Dell, it appears that Michael S. Dell may have a change of heart.

Mr. Dell considers Blackstone’s preliminary proposal to be potentially friendly to management and may reach out to the private equity firm later this week, a person briefed on the matter said on Monday.

Were he to switch, that would mean backing out of his $ 24.4 billion proposal to take control of the company, made in partnership with the private equity firm Silver Lake.

Mr. Dell has already committed to exploring “in good faith the possibility of working with third parties regarding alternative acquisition proposals,” according to a news release that a special committee of Dell’s board put out on Monday.

In many ways, Mr. Dell’s decision makes sense. Because of his roughly 16 percent stake in the company, he would be an important part of any transaction. He has also agreed to contribute about $ 750 million cash to the Silver Lake transaction.

That huge stake also means that he stands to benefit from a higher bid for the company.

Moreover, Blackstone’s proposal so far doesn’t describe what management will look like should it succeed. But the buyout firm has been talking to potential replacements for the chief executive should Mr. Dell step down or be kicked out.

Representatives for Mr. Dell, Silver Lake and Blackstone declined to comment.

Another big shareholder in Dell seems perhaps more pleased by Monday’s news. Southeastern Asset Management, which owns an 8.4 percent stake in the company and which has vocally opposed Mr. Dell’s offer, said in a statement today:

“We are pleased that the alternative proposals submitted to the Dell special committee are structured to give shareholders the opportunity to continue to participate in the company’s future prospects, while also providing a higher cash component for shareholders who choose to exit their investment.”

DealBook: Buyout Effort Ended, Best Buy Founder Returns to Company

DealBook: Buyout Effort Ended, Best Buy Founder Returns to Company

Richard Schulze, who explored and then abandoned a possible buyout bid for Best Buy, is returning to the electronics chain he founded.

Best Buy said on Monday that Mr. Schulze would become chairman emeritus. And two former Best Buy executives whom Mr. Schulze had tapped to be involved in a potential buyout, Brad Anderson and Al Lenzmeier, have been nominated to board seats under an agreement between the company and its founder.

Mr. Schulze had resigned from the board last June and began to work with bankers from Credit Suisse to weigh a bid to take the struggling chain private. But that effort petered out this year and no buyout bid materialized. In February, Mr. Schulze and his three private equity partners â€" Cerberus Capital Management, Leonard Green & Partners and TPG Capital â€" were instead in talks to add to Mr. Schulze’s 21 percent stake in the company.

Now, Mr. Schulze has chosen to support the company’s chief executive, Hubert Joly, in his effort to turn the retailer around.

“Over the past several months, I have come to know and respect Hubert, and have a high regard for the work he and his executive team are doing to revitalize Best Buy for the benefit of all stakeholders,” Mr. Schulze said in a statement. “My dedication to the company that I founded and love is unwavering and, together with Hubert and the board, I determined that the best way to support Best Buy would be to return in support of the initiatives under way.”

United States Wants to Attract Hackers to Public Sector

United States Wants to Attract Hackers to Public Sector

Mary Newman

Virginia high school students competed in a digital defense simulation at the Virginia Governor’s Cup Cyber Challenge at George Mason University.

WASHINGTON â€" In the eighth grade, Arlan Jaska figured out how to write a simple script that could switch his keyboard’s Caps Lock key on and off 6,000 times a minute. When friends weren’t looking, he slipped his program onto their computers. It was all fun and games until the program spread to his middle school.

“They called my parents and told my dad I was hacking their computers,” Mr. Jaska, 17 years old, recalled. He was grounded and got detention. And he is just the type the Department of Homeland Security is looking for.

The secretary of that agency, Janet Napolitano, knows she has a problem that will only worsen. Foreign hackers have been attacking her agency’s computer systems. They have also been busy trying to siphon the nation’s wealth and steal valuable trade secrets. And they have begun probing the nation’s infrastructure â€" the power grid, and water and transportation systems.

So she needs her own hackers â€" 600, the agency estimates. But potential recruits with the right skills have too often been heading for business, and those who do choose government work often go to the National Security Agency, where they work on offensive digital strategies. At Homeland Security, the emphasis is on keeping hackers out, or playing defense.

“We have to show them how cool and exciting this is,” said Ed Skoudis, one of the nation’s top computer security trainers. “And we have to show them that applying these skills to the public sector is important.”

One answer? Start young, and make it a game, even a contest.

This month, Mr. Jaska and his classmate Collin Berman took top spots at the Virginia Governor’s Cup Cyber Challenge, a veritable smackdown of hacking for high school students that was the brainchild of Alan Paller, a security expert, and others in the field.

With military exercises like NetWars, the competition had more the feel of a video game. Mr. Paller helped create the competition, the first in a series, to help Homeland Security, and likens the agency’s need for hackers to the shortage of fighter pilots during World War II.

The job calls for a certain maverick attitude. “I like to break things,” Mr. Berman, 18, said. “I always want to know, ‘How can I change this so it does something else?’ ”

It’s a far different pursuit â€" and a higher-minded one, enlightened hackers will say â€" than simply defacing Web sites.

“You want people who ask: How do things work? But the very best ones turn it around,” said Mr. Paller, director of research at the SANS Institute, a computer security training organization.

It’s no coincidence that the idea of using competitions came, in part, from China, where the People’s Liberation Army runs challenges every spring to identify its next generation of digital warriors.

Tan Dailin, a graduate student, won several of the events in 2005. Soon afterward he put his skills to work and was caught breaking into the Pentagon’s network and sending reams of documents back to servers in China.

“We have no program like that in the United States â€" nothing,” Mr. Paller said. “No one is even teaching this in schools. If we don’t solve this problem, we’re in trouble.”

At Northern Virginia’s acclaimed Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, which both Mr. Jaska and Mr. Berman attend, there are five computer science teachers, but none focused on security.

When eight students expressed interest in starting a security club, they had to persuade a Raytheon employee to meet with them once a week. (One idea for a name, the Hacking Club, didn’t last.

“We don’t want people who are going to go around defacing sites,” Mr. Berman said. They recently rebranded from the Cybersecurity Club to the Computer Security Club. The group dropped the “Cyber” because “it sounds like you’re trying to be cool but you’re not,” clarified Mr. Jaska.)

Mr. Jaska and Mr. Berman heard about the Virginia competition through their school. To qualify, they had to identify bad passwords and clean up security settings â€" a long way from a Caps Lock program.

Some 700 students from 110 Virginia high schools applied, but only 40, including Mr. Jaska and Mr. Berman, made the cut.

So, three weeks ago, the pair traveled to the Governor’s Cup Cyber Challenge at George Mason University.

There, they found something they rarely encounter in high school â€" a thriving community of like-minded teenagers, the best and brightest of a highly specialized task.

Minggu, 24 Maret 2013

DealBook: 2 Rivals Complicate Deal for Dell

DealBook: 2 Rivals Complicate Deal for Dell

Two rival bids for Dell Inc. have emerged, threatening to complicate or change â€" or upend â€" an effort to take the embattled computer maker private in a $ 24 billion deal under the leadership of Michael S. Dell.

The private equity giant Blackstone Group and the investor Carl C. Icahn have each separately submitted preliminary takeover proposals before a deadline set by a special committee of Dell’s board intended to drum up other offers, people who had been briefed on the matter but were not authorized to speak publicly said.

Both proposals are valued at more than the offer of $ 13.65 a share by Mr. Dell and his private equity partner, Silver Lake.

The Dell committee may announce Monday whether it believes either bid is likely to lead to a superior offer, one of the people briefed on the matter said.

But much work remains for Dell’s special committee and the two new bidders. Both of the new proposals are highly preliminary, meant to keep talks going after the 45-day so-called go-shop period.

Neither proposal has firm financing lined up, instead relying on “highly confident” letters from their banks that they can raise the money. Blackstone and its group are working with Morgan Stanley, while Mr. Icahn, who has also built a substantial stake in Dell, is using the Jefferies Group. That means that a final bid from either suitor is weeks away. And Dell’s special committee must also determine whether any such proposal would be superior to the all-cash offer by Mr. Dell and Silver Lake.

Nonetheless, the emergence of two competing bids is a surprising setback to the buyout effort. Few would have predicted Dell, a struggling personal computer maker, would have attracted so much interest when Mr. Dell and Silver Lake announced their takeover offer early last month. Analysts and investors had widely believed that Mr. Dell, who founded the company that bears his name nearly 29 years ago in his college dormitory, would prevail.

At the least, the preliminary bids may lead to a higher offer for Dell shareholders, some of whom have vocally opposed the current bid as undervaluing the company.

Strictly speaking, neither Blackstone nor Mr. Icahn would take Dell completely private, unlike the bid by Mr. Dell and Silver Lake. Both envision leaving part of the company public through what is known as a stub, which would allow current shareholders to keep a stake.

Blackstone proposed paying more than $ 14.25 a share, working with two technology-focused investment firms, Francisco Partners and Insight Venture Partners. While the private equity firm did not specify what percentage of Dell would remain public, it proposed letting shareholders sell their entire holdings if so desired. Blackstone has also weighed selling part of Dell’s business, like its financial arm, to help pay for any deal.

Mr. Icahn outlined a plan to pay $ 15 a share for about 58 percent of the company, meaning that other investors would be allowed to sell only part of their stakes.

Should the special Dell committee choose an offer from either suitor, Mr. Dell and Silver Lake would have just one chance to match or top that bid.

The appearance of Blackstone as a potential spoiler is one of the few times that a private equity firm has “jumped” another’s deal. Blackstone and others in the private equity industry are fighting off an antitrust lawsuit in the Federal District Court in Boston that cites this apparent industry custom as evidence of collusion.

The appearance of Blackstone and Mr. Icahn was also one of the rare instances when a go-shop period actually attracted another suitor. By one deal maker’s reckoning, fewer than 20 percent of these efforts for a deal worth more than $ 1 billion have found an alternative offer.

Letting some shareholders remain invested in Dell could go a long way toward appeasing one of the most vocal critics of the current deal: Southeastern Asset Management, the company’s biggest outside investor, with a stake of about 8.4 percent. Southeastern has declared publicly that it will not accept Mr. Dell’s offer, and floated the idea of a public stub.

Blackstone has spoken with Southeastern, people briefed on the matter said.

Mr. Icahn, who disclosed in a letter last Friday to the Dell special committee that he owns 80 million shares, or less than 5 percent of the company, had previously told the committee that he opposed Mr. Dell’s current bid. Neither Mr. Icahn nor Blackstone offered specifics about how they would run Dell after the deal is completed. While Mr. Dell has committed to negotiating with any party that the special board committee deems likely to produce a superior proposal, he is free to leave his post as chief executive.

Blackstone has approached possible replacements for Mr. Dell. But at least one of them, Oracle’s president, Mark V. Hurd, has expressed little interest.

Blackstone and Mr. Icahn could also have difficulty financing their offers. Mr. Dell and Silver Lake have lined up five major lenders to support their bid. It is not clear whether any banks would support a higher-priced offer that would lay more debt onto a company whose business is widely seen as deteriorating.

Another factor the special Dell committee must weigh is the cost of leaving some Dell shares publicly traded on the Nasdaq stock market. Underlying the premise of Mr. Dell’s bid is his contention that the changes needed to fix the company would upset public shareholders, further hurting its stock price.

Andrew Ross Sorkin contributed reporting.

Universal Music Group and Samsung Offer Digital Music Service

Universal Music Group and Samsung Offer Digital Music Service

SERRAVAL, FRANCE â€" The music business recently celebrated a milestone in the form of its first annual revenue growth since 1999, but one region, Africa, was unable to join the party. Digital music, responsible for the improvement in the industry’s brighter overall outlook, has failed to catch on across much of Africa.

But that may be about to change, as new local and international digital music services open or expand, suggesting that industry executives and investors see potential for profit.

In one of the highest-profile moves so far, Universal Music Group and Samsung announced this month the creation of The Kleek, a Pan-African digital music service. It features music from Universal’s international catalog and from local artists like the Power Boyz in Angola, DJ Vetkuk in South Africa and W4 in Nigeria.

In December, South Africans were given access to the iTunes digital music store from Apple. Around the same time, one of the leading Internet streaming music services, Deezer, a French company, expanded across much of Africa. And in several countries, including Nigeria, local digital music operations like iRoking have started to attract large numbers of listeners.

“I think there’s a feeling that let’s give it a try, where before everyone was saying, ‘I’m just going to sit on my ball and refuse to play,”’ said Simon Dyson, an analyst at Informa, a research company in London.

While digital music now accounts for more than half of the revenue in the music industry in the United States, and is finally making a substantial contribution to the bottom line in Europe and some Asian markets, the challenges remain formidable in Africa, analysts say.

Piracy is rife, with renegade CD factories thriving and street vendors doing a brisk business selling digital memory cards already loaded with the latest hits. Except in South Africa, there is little or no official music-licensing structure across much of sub-Saharan Africa and often no way for musicians and other rights holders to collect revenue from sales or performances of their work. Even in South Africa, digital music still accounts for less than 10 percent of sales, analysts say.

Broadband connections, especially the fixed-line variety, are unavailable or remain a luxury in much of Africa, so downloading or streaming music or other media to desktop computers is a niche market. So most African consumers listen to digital music on their mobile phones, and in many markets, selling ringtones is the main route to revenue.

Informa estimates that 70 percent of the African music business consists of local repertoire, with international artists, who dominate elsewhere, representing only a minority of what people are listening to. That presents an additional challenge for the major record labels and digital services based outside the region, which tend to generate the bulk of their sales from a handful of hits.

“It’s easy to turn on digital services in new markets,” said Francis Keeling, the London-based global head of the digital business at Universal. “The difference is, are they going to have local content, editorial teams and realistic pricing, along with active marketing. We looked at the market for a long time and decided that Africa needed its own service, aimed at African consumers.”

Universal says it wants to sign other major record companies to The Kleek and has also struck agreements with a number of African labels. Rather than offering downloads, like iTunes, or on-demand streaming, like Deezer and Spotify, another digital service that is popular in developed markets, The Kleek offers a radiolike experience.

Users of the service can choose from playlists consisting of local music or international hits, interspersed with artist interviews, concert reviews and gossip, streamed to cellphones. Because of limited bandwidth, the recordings are short, generally 10 minutes or less.

“It allows you to get a window on what is hip and happening in each territory,” Randall Abrahams, managing director of Universal for sub-Saharan Africa, said by telephone.

Raw Data: Supply and Artificially High Demand in European Mobile Spectrum

Raw Data: Supply and Artificially High Demand in European Mobile Spectrum

BERLIN â€" As the amount of data carried on mobile networks explodes â€" Cisco Systems estimates the level will rise about 66 percent this year â€" countries across Europe are busy selling off their broadcast spectrum to keep the digital discourse flowing.

A recent spate of auctions â€" in the Netherlands in December, in Britain in February and in the Czech Republic this month â€" has reinforced the perception that Europe does not have enough available frequency to satisfy the demand for talking, texting and surfing the Net on mobile phones.

The Dutch auction raised €3.8 billion, or $ 4.9 billion, much more than some had forecast, while the Czech auction March 11 was halted by the national regulator because of its concern that the high bids would make faster, Long Term Evolution broadband too expensive for consumers. The auction was stopped after the initial bidding climbed to more than 20 billion korunas, or $ 1 billion â€" almost three times the amount of revenue the government had expected.

But two other influences on the bidding had nothing to do with demand for spectrum.

Regulators in each country set aside part of the spectrum they were selling for a new operator, or to favor a smaller bidder, which required big operators to compete more aggressively.

In the Netherlands, the Dutch regulator reserved a third of the prime 800-megahertz spectrum for a new entrant, which turned out to be Tele2 of Sweden. In Britain, the regulator, Ofcom, structured its sale so that 3, the smallest British operator, would receive a disproportionate share of spectrum, in effect creating a fourth, nationwide operator.

Another big influence on the overheated bidding was the structure of the auctions. In the British, Dutch and Czech auctions, as well as in previous auctions in Switzerland and Denmark, regulators used a “combinatorial clock auction,” a complex bidding format devised by game theorists that generally leads to higher payouts.

Under this method, known as C.C.A., operators must submit hundreds, often thousands, of parallel bids for various combinations of the frequencies being sold. Ultimately, the price a winning operator pays is determined not by the price it offered but by the price its competitors bid for the same wavelengths.

Scott McKenzie, a director at Coleago Consulting, a firm in London that advises operators on spectrum auctions, said the use of the C.C.A. auction format and the efforts to introduce new competitors in each market were two reasons for the higher payouts.

By contrast, a 2010 auction in Germany, the biggest national telecommunications market in Europe, raised just €4.4 billion. That was because the German regulator, the Bundesnetzagentur, chose a more traditional format, the simultaneous multiround ascending auction, in which bidding proceeds in linear fashion until the highest offer wins.

Mr. McKenzie said there was probably no shortage of spectrum in Europe, despite some industry and government assertions otherwise. “I’ve been in this business 25 years and they’ve always been saying that we’re going to run out of spectrum,” he said. “But it has never happened.”

One reason is that network equipment operators like Ericsson, Huawei and Nokia Siemens Networks continue to get more capacity out of 3G networks, or develop new ones based on LTE. Seven years ago, before the advent of modern smartphones, the International Telecommunication Union, a United Nations agency in Geneva that coordinates global radio frequencies, predicted a coming spectrum crisis.

“But if the I.T.U. forecast had held true, all mobile networks with significant mobile broadband usage would have crashed by now,” said Stéphane Téral, an analyst at Infonetics Research, in California. Gains in network efficiency, and the use of private and public Wi-Fi to carry wireless data, are reasons the big crash has not materialized, Mr. Téral said.

Starting in 2017, the universe of available frequencies will expand again in Europe, when some countries begin to sell portions of their 700-megahertz spectrum to mobile operators for the first time. The frequency band is currently being used by digital terrestrial television broadcasters.

Finland is planning the Continent’s first auction.

Staplers, the Attachment That’s Still Making Noise

Staplers, the Attachment That’s Still Making Noise

Daniel Borris for The New York Times

If you do, maybe it’s a little dusty in this age of PDFs. Or maybe it’s been missing for a while, after someone borrowed it and never brought it back. Or maybe you’ve affixed your name to your stapler with a piece of clear tape, so your co-workers know: you take this stapler, you die.

Even as data moves to computers and the cloud, staplers continue to help people keep it together. On the computer, we can file copies in folders and send messages to mailboxes. We can cut, copy and paste text and files. But which computer activity is similar to stapling? Sure, there’s the paper-clip icon that attaches documents to e-mail. But nothing, really, comes close to the satisfying ka-chunk of a stapler: it’s a sound that means work is getting done.

Paper receipts are supposed to be on their way out, but they continue to flutter their way through restaurants, stores and doctors’ offices. Staplers are there, attaching the receipt to the business card, the return receipt to the original receipt, the merchant copy to the bill, the receipt to the takeout bag.

If you have a stapler, the odds are fairly good that it was made by Swingline. Other companies, including Stanley-Bostitch, along with OfficeMax and Staples, also make staplers. But Swingline, now owned by Acco Brands, has long been the market leader.

Acco, based in suburban Chicago, sounds like the perfect name for a faceless conglomerate from the era of “The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit.” But it actually has a sterling office products pedigree â€" it is short for the American Clip Company, a manufacturer of paper clips founded by Fred. J. Kline of Queens at the turn of the 20th century.

Ruby Washington/The New York Times

Signs at Swingline’s old plant in Queens came down in 1999.

Queens was once the center of the paper-fastening universe. In 1925, it was where Jack Linsky founded the Parrot Speed Fastener Company, later renamed Swingline. For years, the bright red sign of his Swingline factory was a beacon to Queens residents as they drove across the Queensboro Bridge from Manhattan.

Stapling devices have existed since at the least the French court of Louis XV. But before Mr. Linsky’s time, staples generally had to be laboriously loaded, one by one, into the rear of the stapler. Mr. Linsky helped revolutionize stapling by creating an easy way to fill the devices under a horizontal cap. He found an adhesive that could attach staples in rows so that they stayed together in a metal magazine until they were pushed out and bent individually to grip their paper quarry.

Swingline promised to make office work easy. In a newspaper ad from the 1940s, a young woman â€" presumably a secretary â€" loads a stapler and says: “Now we’re in the groove, boss! That Swingline Stapler loads quicker, works slicker because of its open, trouble-free channel.”

But Mr. Linsky wasn’t satisfied to serve only the office market; he helped increase demand for staplers by emphasizing their handiness in other tasks, like tacking shelf paper, fastening paper around sandwiches and constructing party hats. (“Swingline does the darnedest things!” another ad boasted.) He also expanded the business by making specialized staplers for carpeting, roofing and auto upholstery.

In 1970, Mr. Linsky sold Swingline to American Brands, and in the next decade Acco merged into Swingline. Amid the manufacturing crisis of the 1990s, American Brands closed the Swingline factory in Queens and moved its manufacturing to Mexico; nearly 500 New York workers lost their jobs, and the Swingline sign came down. Now most staplers are produced in Asia.

Swingline made Mr. Linsky very rich. He and his wife, Belle, were philanthropists and art collectors who once owned one of the largest collections of Fabergé eggs in America. Jack died in 1980, and in 1982 Belle donated a collection of the couple’s European art, then worth $ 60 million, to the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Staplers generally don’t rise to the level of prized collectibles, which is why a Swingline’s role as an object of obsession was so funny in the 1999 cult comedy"Office Space.”

Sabtu, 23 Maret 2013

Unboxed: Big Data and a Renewed Debate Over Privacy

Unboxed: Big Data and a Renewed Debate Over Privacy

IN the 1960s, mainframe computers posed a significant technological challenge to common notions of privacy. That’s when the federal government started putting tax returns into those giant machines, and consumer credit bureaus began building databases containing the personal financial information of millions of Americans. Many people feared that the new computerized databanks would be put in the service of an intrusive corporate or government Big Brother.

“It really freaked people out,” says Daniel J. Weitzner, a former senior Internet policy official in the Obama administration. “The people who cared about privacy were every bit as worried as we are now.”

Along with fueling privacy concerns, of course, the mainframes helped prompt the growth and innovation that we have come to associate with the computer age. Today, many experts predict that the next wave will be driven by technologies that fly under the banner of Big Data â€" data including Web pages, browsing habits, sensor signals, smartphone location trails and genomic information, combined with clever software to make sense of it all.

Proponents of this new technology say it is allowing us to see and measure things as never before â€" much as the microscope allowed scientists to examine the mysteries of life at the cellular level. Big Data, they say, will open the door to making smarter decisions in every field from business and biology to public health and energy conservation.

“This data is a new asset,” says Alex Pentland, a computational social scientist and director of the Human Dynamics Lab at the M.I.T. “You want it to be liquid and to be used.”

But the latest leaps in data collection are raising new concern about infringements on privacy â€" an issue so crucial that it could trump all others and upset the Big Data bandwagon. Dr. Pentland is a champion of the Big Data vision and believes the future will be a data-driven society. Yet the surveillance possibilities of the technology, he acknowledges, could leave George Orwell in the dust.

The World Economic Forum published a report late last month that offered one path â€" one that leans heavily on technology to protect privacy. The report grew out of a series of workshops on privacy held over the last year, sponsored by the forum and attended by government officials and privacy advocates, as well as business executives. The corporate members, more than others, shaped the final document.

The report, “Unlocking the Value of Personal Data: From Collection to Usage,” recommends a major shift in the focus of regulation toward restricting the use of data. Curbs on the use of personal data, combined with new technological options, can give individuals control of their own information, according to the report, while permitting important data assets to flow relatively freely.

“There’s no bad data, only bad uses of data,” says Craig Mundie, a senior adviser at Microsoft, who worked on the position paper.

The report contains echoes of earlier times. The Fair Credit Reporting Act, passed in 1970, was the main response to the mainframe privacy challenge. The law permitted the collection of personal financial information by the credit bureaus, but restricted its use mainly to three areas: credit, insurance and employment.

The forum report suggests a future in which all collected data would be tagged with software code that included an individual’s preferences for how his or her data is used. All uses of data would have to be registered, and there would be penalties for violators. For example, one violation might be a smartphone application that stored more data than is necessary for a registered service like a smartphone game or a restaurant finder.

The corporate members of the forum say they recognize the need to address privacy concerns if useful data is going to keep flowing. George C. Halvorson, chief executive of Kaiser Permanente, the large health care provider, extols the benefits of its growing database on nine million patients, tracking treatments and outcomes to improve care, especially in managing costly chronic and debilitating conditions like heart disease, diabetes and depression. New smartphone applications, he says, promise further gains â€" for example, a person with a history of depression whose movement patterns slowed sharply would get a check-in call.

“We’re on the cusp of a golden age of medical science and care delivery,” Mr. Halvorson says. “But a privacy backlash could cripple progress.”